Service agreement
SignedExample
Completed with the evidence recordArticle 10 of Provisional Measure 2.200-2 says the measure does not bar another way to prove who made an electronic document and that it stayed intact, if the parties admit that way or the person it is used against accepts it. An ICP-Brasil qualified signature is a different signature. inSigner keeps the completion record with the file.
Simple electronic signature on Essential and Pro · not an ICP-Brasil qualified signature
Service agreement
SignedExample
Completed with the evidence record§2Another means, if admitted
Art. 10Provisional Measure 2.200-2
Art. 4Three levels in Law 14,063
PDF + recordSHA-256 of the final file
One flow. A clear record.
A clear signing path that records intent, each action, and the evidence behind the agreement.
Upload the document, place the fields, and name every signer.
See how it worksEach signer accepts the electronic process and signs the fields you placed.
See how it worksDownload the completed PDF together with its evidence record.
See how it worksEveryday agreements
Upload a PDF and keep the completion record with the file. Documents that need an ICP-Brasil qualified signature or a public deed are not on this list.
And many more.
The Brazilian framework
Article 10 of Provisional Measure 2.200-2 of 24 August 2001 says the electronic documents that measure deals with are public or private documents for all legal purposes. Paragraph 1 presumes the statements in a document produced with ICP-Brasil certification are true as to the signatories, in the form of article 131 of the Civil Code of 1916. Paragraph 2 says the measure does not prevent another means of proving authorship and integrity, including a certificate that ICP-Brasil did not issue, if the parties admit it as valid or the person against whom the document is used accepts it. Law 14,063 of 2020 then separates a simple electronic signature, an advanced electronic signature, and a qualified electronic signature. The standard inSigner signature is not an ICP-Brasil qualified signature.
§2
MP 2.200-2
The opening of article 10 is about the electronic documents the provisional measure deals with. It is not a rule for any file. Paragraph 1 is the presumption for a document produced with the ICP-Brasil certification process, and the text on the Planalto site still cites article 131 of Law 3,071 of 1916. Paragraph 2 is the private-party rule: another means is available if the parties admit it as valid, or if the person against whom the document is used accepts it. Article 107 of the Civil Code says a declaration of will needs no special form unless the law expressly requires one. Article 219 says statements in a signed document are presumed true as to the signatories. inSigner does not decide whether paragraph 2 is met.
ICP
Law 14,063 of 2020
Article 4 describes three levels. A qualified signature uses an ICP-Brasil certificate under paragraph 1 of article 10, and paragraph 1 of article 4 calls it the highest level of reliability. An advanced signature needs a non-ICP certificate or another admitted means, a univocal link to the signer, exclusive control with a high level of confidence, and a detectable later change. Article 2 says that chapter does not apply to dealings between natural persons or between private legal entities. Article 5 is the rule for a public body. inSigner does not issue an ICP-Brasil certificate and is not an accredited certification authority. QES for Europe is an Enterprise option and is not an ICP-Brasil signature.
Evidence, not just a signature
The completion record brings together who was invited, what they signed, and the hash of the final file.
Evidence record
ExampleIf the file changes, the hash no longer matches. Download it with the PDF.
The record keeps the acceptance of the electronic process.
Name, email or phone, and the send, view, and sign events.
A chronological record from delivery to completion.
A SHA-256 hash shows whether the final file still matches.
Private agreements
The same completion record for private agreements that do not need an ICP-Brasil qualified signature or a public deed.
Sales contracts
Vendor agreements
NDAs
Proposals
Orders
Statements of work
Offer letters
Policy acknowledgments
The same flow
In the languages you already use
Questions, answered
The limits sit here, including article 10, an ICP-Brasil qualified signature, Law 14,063, and the claims this page does not make.
Contact our teamThe parts of an electronic signature flow in Brazil that the service offers today.
For the documents Provisional Measure 2.200-2 of 24 August 2001 deals with, article 10 says those electronic documents are public or private documents for all legal purposes. Paragraph 1 says statements in documents produced with the ICP-Brasil certification process are presumed true as to the signatories, in the form of article 131 of Law 3,071 of 1 January 1916. The text on the Planalto site still cites that 1916 article. Paragraph 2 says the measure does not prevent another means of proving authorship and integrity of an electronic document, including certificates not issued by ICP-Brasil, if the parties admit that means as valid or the person against whom the document is used accepts it. Article 107 of the Civil Code, Law 10,406 of 2002, says a declaration of will needs no special form unless the law expressly requires one. Article 219 says statements in signed documents are presumed true as to the signatories. Article 221 says a private instrument signed by a person who can freely dispose of their property proves conventional obligations of any value, but its effects against third persons do not arise before it is filed in a public registry. The standard inSigner signature is a simple electronic signature. It is not an advanced electronic signature under article 4, item II, of Law 14,063 of 2020, and it is not an ICP-Brasil qualified signature. Whether paragraph 2 applies still depends on the document, the parties, and the person the document is used against. inSigner does not decide that question.
Law 14,063 of 23 September 2020 classifies electronic signatures in article 4. A simple electronic signature identifies the signer and attaches or associates data with other electronic data of the signer. An advanced electronic signature uses a certificate not issued by ICP-Brasil, or another means of proving authorship and integrity, if the parties admit it as valid or the person against whom the document is used accepts it. It must also be linked to the signer in a univocal way, use creation data the signer can operate under exclusive control with a high level of confidence, and be linked so that any later change is detectable. A qualified electronic signature uses a digital certificate under paragraph 1 of article 10 of Provisional Measure 2.200-2. Paragraph 1 of article 4 says the qualified signature has the highest level of reliability. Article 2 says the chapter sets rules for internal interaction of public bodies, for interaction between private persons or private legal entities and those public bodies, and for interaction among those public bodies. The sole paragraph says the chapter does not apply to interaction between natural persons or between private legal entities. inSigner does not issue an ICP-Brasil certificate and is not an accredited certification authority or registration authority. QES for Europe is an Enterprise option and is not an ICP-Brasil qualified signature.
Each person signs the fields you placed on the document you sent. The evidence record keeps their name and email or phone, when the document was sent, viewed, and signed, the IP address, the device data, and the authentication used.
Yes. You can download the completed PDF and the evidence record, including a SHA-256 hash of the final file. If a single byte changes, the hash no longer matches. The hash shows whether the final file still matches. It is not an ICP-Brasil certificate, it is not a qualified signature under article 4 of Law 14,063, and it is not a digital time stamp.
The limits, including the claims this page does not make.
No. Essential and Pro use a simple electronic signature. Article 4, item II, of Law 14,063 describes an advanced electronic signature, and item III describes a qualified signature that uses an ICP-Brasil certificate. inSigner does not issue that certificate. QES for Europe is an Enterprise option, priced separately, and it is not an ICP-Brasil signature. It is not on Essential or Pro.
No. Article 10 of the provisional measure is not a filing rule for a public body. Article 5 of Law 14,063 says each public body sets the minimum signature level for documents and interactions with that body. A simple signature may be allowed for low-impact interactions that do not involve classified information. A qualified signature is required for an electronic invoice, except when the issuer is an individual or a micro-entrepreneur (MEI), for the transfer and registration of immovable property, with the commercial-board exception in article 5, paragraph 1, item II, letter c, and in the other cases the law sets, including acts signed by a head of a branch of government or a minister. Article 13 says prescriptions for controlled medicines and electronic medical certificates are valid only with a qualified signature of the health professional. Article 17-A, added by Law 14,620 of 2023, says certain real-estate credit instruments may use an advanced or a qualified signature. Article 108 of the Civil Code requires a public deed for many transfers of real rights over immovable property above the threshold the article sets. inSigner does not issue an electronic invoice, does not file a property transfer, and does not act as a notary or a commercial board. Your counsel decides the form a document needs.
Not by itself. Paragraph 2 of article 10 is met when the parties admit the means as valid, or when the person against whom the document is used accepts it. Accepting the electronic process in inSigner records consent to sign that document. It does not, by itself, prove that a third person admitted the means, and it is not the signature level a public body requires under article 5 of Law 14,063.
No. For the documents you send, you decide the purpose. inSigner does not write your privacy notice and does not make a workflow comply with Law 13,709 of 2018, the LGPD. Nubesti handles the account, billing, security, support, and marketing. Do not use the product by default for patient forms, clinical consent, account opening, credit decisions, or KYC. Identity checks are add-ons priced separately. There is no public status page and no uptime percentage. The mobile apps are planned, not a public download.
The legislation itself, not a summary from a vendor.
This page is general information about Brazilian law, not legal advice. The signature policy in the legal center is the binding text. Responsibilities for electronic signatures
Your next agreement in Brazil starts here
Create an account and send a private agreement with its completion record.